Sunday, December 13, 2015

Jehovah's Witness Lies


                                        Jehovah's Witness Lies


If you are a Jehovah's Witness, if you are someone studying with a JW, or if you are someone who just knows a JW, please read through this website. There is undeniable proof that the Jehovah's Witness religion is not from God and the 'WatchTower' is run by a bunch of biased, deceptive, and lying men. Please know, there are NO 'APOSTATE' MATERIALS posted here. All images and quotes are taken from the Watchtower's own publications and have already been read by millions of Jehovah's Witnesses. So there is no reason to disregard this information or run away in fear. All the information presented here is meant to help Jehovah's Witnesses wake up and stop wasting their lives working as slaves. With a little time and with a little patience, everyone should be able to clearly see the real truth. Please also know, this website is not intended to go against the good, hard working, and dedicated people who are Jehovah's Witnesses. The goal of this website is to go against the 'WatchTower' and the actual Jehovah's Witness religion because their deception and lies have fooled millions.
Proof Jesus Is God Almighty
Jehovah's Witnesses believe that Jesus is not God, but rather the first creation of Jehovah God. Many JW's will admit to the diety of Jesus and say he is 'a God' or a 'separate God' or 'God-like', but not the same as Jehovah God. This contradicts many scriptures though! Just one example is at Isaiah 44:6-8 which clearly says there is only ONE God and there is none like him. They also teach that Jesus is a spirit creature called Michael the Archangel and that he was recreated after dying. This also contradicts many scriptures. The Watchtower will do everything possible to keep their members from knowing the truth. Whatever they can get away with, is what they will do. Fortunately, they were not able to completely hide the truth and it is quite easy to prove from their own New World Translation (NWT) that Jesus is in fact God Almighty. See the proof from their own 2013 NWT Bible below.
Hebrews 1:10-12 - Notice that these scriptures are clearly talking ABOUT JESUS. See verse 8 in case there is any doubt. There is a reference back to Psalms 102:25-27. Make sure to read Hebrews 1:10-12 entirely before proceeding in order to understand the point. What you will notice is that this is a new testament quotation from the old testament. After you have read Hebrews 1:10-12, look at the next image below to see what Psalms 102:25-27 actually says.
Hebrews 1:10-12 : New World Translation calls Jesus Lord and has a reference back to Psalms 102:25-27 which is an almost word for word reference about Jehovah God! So in their own Bible, it is linking Jesus to Jehovah God in the old testament.
Psalms 102:25-27 - Here it is clearly talking ABOUT JEHOVAH. Even a JW must agree with this. What we have here is an old testament passage which is almost exactly the same word-for-word as Hebrews 1:10-12 which is about Jesus! So in Psalms it is referring to Jehovah, but in Hebrews it is referring to Jesus. Both passages have cross references pointing back to each other in the NWT. So the WatchTower even realizes and agrees that these 2 sets of scripture are related. Read the 2 passages of scripture carefully, and there is no denying that the NWT Bible proves Jesus is Jehovah.
Psalms 102:25-27 is clearly talking about Jehovah God. Even a JW must agree with this. This is an old testament passage which is almost exactly the same as Hebrews 1:10-12 which is about Jesus! The NWT even has a reference pointing to Hebrews 1:10-12 also.

Here is also a short list of scriptures proving Jesus is God. This is not a full list. All these come from the JW's own Bible.
  1. Deuteronomy 6:16 - While in the desert, the Israelites tested God. Compare also Numbers 21:6 and Exodus 17:7. We can see that JEHOVAH WAS TESTED AND SENT THE SERPENTS. However, according to 1 Corinthians 10:9, JESUS WAS TESTED AND SENT THE SERPENTS. Please refer to the 'WatchTower Is Deceptive!' section of this site for more supporting information. The true meaning does in fact mean Jesus even though the NWT says Jehovah. They translated the text incorrectly in order to hide that Jesus is Jehovah.

    There are also biblical parallels that support this fact:

    1. The Israelites were in the desert for 40 years. Jesus was in the desert 40 days.
    2. The Israelites TESTED JEHOVAH in the desert. Satan TESTED JESUS in the desert. See Matthew 4:7 and Luke 4:12.
    3. The Israelites TESTED JEHOVAH by asking if Jehovah was in their midst or not. Satan TESTED JESUS the same way by asking him to prove he was the Son (God) even though Jesus was in his midst.

  2. Isaiah 44:6 - This verse is clearly talking ABOUT JEHOVAH. Jehovah is the 'first and the last' and there is no God but him. Compare this to the reference they have for Revelation 22:13. Here it is talking ABOUT JESUS and it says Jesus is the 'first and the last'. They even have a reference pointing back to Isaiah 44:6. So the Watchtower agrees that these 2 sets of scriptures are related. In Isaiah, the verse was about Jehovah, but in Revelation it is about Jesus! In case there is any doubt Revelation 22:13 is about Jesus, notice in verse 12 how it states Jesus is coming and in verse 20 it says "Come, Lord Jesus". The entire time it is talking about Jesus! Here once again, the NWT has linked Jehovah in the old testament to Jesus in the new testament, proving that Jesus is Jehovah God. Revelation 1:17-18 also uses the phrase 'first and the last' and the 'first and the last' became dead. Jehovah's Witnesses, when did Jehovah ever die? The 'first and the last' must be Jesus himself. And as Isaiah 44:6 in your own Bible proves, the 'first and the last' is Jehovah. Therefore, Jesus is Jehovah!

  3. Isaiah 9:6 - Jesus is called 'Mighty God' plain and simple. There is a big 'G' for God and not a little 'g'. A Jehovah's Witness may say in reply that Jesus is a separate big 'G' God other than Jehovah. Which contradicts scripture since there is only ONE God! So Jesus must be God without contradicting scripture. Even ignoring that, according to their own Bible, Jehovah is called the same term 'Mighty God' though. This can be found just one chapter later at Isaiah 10:21. So in Isaiah 9:6, JESUS IS MIGHTY GOD, but in Isaiah 10:21, JEHOVAH IS MIGHTY GOD. All this can mean only one thing, and that is, Jesus is Jehovah God.

  4. Zechariah 11:12-13 - Thirty pieces of silver were weighed out in verse 12. In verse 13, Jehovah says that this is the price that he had been valued at. We all know that Judas betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver. The Watchtower even recognizes the connection between these verses and Jesus because they have a cross reference pointing to the New Testament. So we see clearly that Jehovah was valued at this price and Jesus was valued at this price. Which can only mean that Jesus is Jehovah!

  5. Matthew 1:23 - Jesus is called 'Immanuel' which means 'With us is God'.

  6. John 2:19-21 - Jesus told the Jews that if they destroyed this temple that HE would raise it again in 3 days. The ‘temple’ is then defined plainly as his BODY. So it is clear that JESUS RAISED HIS OWN BODY. This proves Jesus is God because the Bible says GOD RAISED JESUS. See Acts 2:24, Acts 2:32, Acts 3:15, Acts 3:26, Acts 4:10, Acts 5:30, Acts 10:40, Acts 13:30-37, Romans 4:24, Romans 6:4, Romans 10:9, 1 Corinthians 6:14, Galations 1:1, Ephesians 1:17-20, Colossians 2:12, and 1 Peter 1:21.

  7. John 5:18 - Everyone understood by his words that Jesus was making himself equal with God.

  8. John 10:30-33 - The Jews picked up stones to kill Jesus because of blasphemy for claiming to be God. The JWs have Jesus here as a little 'g' God, which makes Jesus claiming to be a false god. If he was claiming to be a false god, he would not be guilty of blasphemy. They wanted to kill him because of claiming to be the true God.

  9. John 12:41 - John says Isaiah saw Jesus' glory and spoke about him. The New World Translation has a cross reference pointing back to Isaiah 6:1,8. There Isaiah saw Jehovah and spoke about him. There is even a cross reference pointing to John 12:41. So the Watchtower agrees that these scriptures are related. In Isaiah, it is ABOUT JEHOVAH, but in John it is ABOUT JESUS. Which proves from the New World Translation that Jesus is Jehovah!

  10. John 14:8-9 - Philip still didn't get the point and said something Jesus considered silly. Jesus replied back proving he is God.

  11. John 14:14 - Jesus said we can pray to him in his own name.
    IMPORTANT NOTE : They removed the word 'me' from this verse to try and hide the fact that we can pray to Jesus himself. You can prove to a JW that the word must be there from their own Kingdom Interlinear Translation though.

  12. John 20:28 - Thomas called Jesus 'God' with a big 'G'. A JW will say Thomas simply said this out of shock or some other lame excuse. Even if this were the case, Jesus never corrected the mistake. He actually confirmed that Thomas was correct.

  13. Acts 7:59 - Stephen prayed to Jesus. Only God can be prayed to.
    IMPORTANT NOTE: The word here is translated in other verses as 'called on' or 'called out to'. For example, they properly translated the word in Acts 2:21, Acts 9:14, Acts 9:21, Acts 22:16, Romans 10:12-14, and 2 Tim. 2:22. The word can also mean 'appeal to', but they did not even render it this way! They intentionally used the phrase 'made this appeal' which is vague and hides who the appeal was made to. They are trying to hide the fact that Jesus was prayed to which would make him God. However, we know it means prayer because they admitted this in their 1950 version of Acts 7:59! Also, common sense tells us that it is a prayer since Jesus was nowhere near Stephen during his death and he said 'receive my spirit'. Nobody other than God himself could ever be prayed to and receive someone's spirit.

  14. 1 John 1:5-7 - This verse clearly shows that GOD IS LIGHT. Notice that the 'him' being referred to here is God. This can be seen in verse 7 since it says "Jesus his Son'. So the 'him' and 'his' are clearly referring to God himself. Now, here is the point. The author says that this is the message that they heard from 'him' (God). So when did they receive this message and who gave them this message? The answer is in John's Gospel. According to John 1:9, JESUS IS THE TRUE LIGHT. Where did John here this from? The answer can be found in the same book at John 12:35-36. Jesus himself gave them this message that he is the light. In 1 John 1:5-7, it says God gave them this message, but in the book of John, Jesus himself gave them this message.

  15. Revelation 1:7-8 - Jesus is called the Alpha and Omega, Jehovah God, and the Almighty. We know it is Jesus because in verse 7 it says he was pierced. Jesus was the one that was pierced. Even the original Jehovah's Witnesses were taught that the 'Almighty' in this verse was Jesus himself. See the proof of this below.

  16. Revelation 5:13-14 - Jehovah (God the Father) and the Lamb (Jesus) are both worshipped at the same time. The Bible is clear that only the one true God may be worshipped. Anything else is a contradiction to plain biblical truth. Therefore, Jesus must be Jehovah without contradicting scripture. There are several other scriptures that show JESUS WAS WORSHIPPED, but the Watchtower has translated them as 'obeisance'. The Watchtower has admitted several times in the past that Jesus was worshipped and can be worshipped. Below are some examples.

New World Translation is Biased
Anyone who has talked to a Jehovah's Witness will probably know how fearful they are of looking at anything not published by the Watchtower. They will often repeat the same memorized phrases over and over about this. One of the reasons they often give is that other materials are so biased. Well, the Watchtower publications, including their New World Translation, are extremely biased. See proof directly from their own 2013 NWT Bible and also their 1969 Kingdom Interlinear Translation. Please note, this is just a drop in the bucket compared to everything that could be said about this topic. There are many other examples not mentioned here.
Isaiah 9:6 - Here it states a child and son that was born. Which is an obvious reference to Jesus Christ. Then it calls the child 'Mighty God' with a big 'G'. This is yet more proof that Jesus is God, but besides that, you will see an example of their biased Bible. Compare this verse to their reference at John 1:18 to see the point.
Isaiah 9:6 mentions a child and a son being born which is an obvious reference to Jesus Christ. The main part to notice is how Jesus is called Mighty God. Compare with their reference to John 1:18.
John 1:18 - Here the NWT calls Jesus as a little 'g' god. So they go from a big 'G' in Isaiah 9:6 to a little 'g' to demote Jesus. They demote Jesus like this since they teach that Jesus is not God Almighty. So they try and make Jesus a separate, smaller or less powerful God. Which contradicts the Bible, but that is another topic. Not only is the Watchtower biased in doing this, but they are inconsistent.
John 1:18 in the NWT has Jesus as a little 'g' God. They go from a big 'G' in Isaiah 9:6 to a little 'g' to demote Jesus since it doesn't agree with their doctrine.



  • Matthew 2:8,11 : Matthew 2:8,11 from their 1969 Kingdom Interlinear Translation both have the word 'proskuneo' translated as 'obeisance' since it is in regards to Jesus. They never translate this word as 'worship' because they are biased against Jesus and believe Jesus is not God. So him being worshipped contradicts their belief and they changed it. However, they do translate this word as 'worship' when the verse is about Satan! See an example below.



  • Matthew 4:9-10 : Matthew 4:9-10 from their 1969 Kingdom Interlinear Translation are examples of when they translate the word 'proskuneo' as 'worship'. This word is used many times in the new testament. They always translate it as 'worship' when the verse is about Jehovah or Satan. Never do they translate the word as 'worship' when the verse is about Jesus though! Jehovah's Witnesses, how is this not biased???



  • Acts 7:59 : According to their 1969 Kingdom Interlinear Translation, Stephen 'called upon' Jesus. On the right side, they have it rendered as 'made appeal' though. It is obvious how they decreased the meaning of the text by going from 'calling upon' to simply 'made appeal'. The word is translated in other verses as 'called on' or 'called out to'. For example, they properly translated the word in Acts 2:21, Acts 9:14, Acts 9:21, Acts 22:16, Romans 10:12-14, and 2 Tim. 2:22. The word can actually mean 'appeal to', but they did not even render it this way! In their newest NWT (2013), they intentionally used the phrase 'made this appeal' which is vague and hides who the appeal was made to. They are trying to hide the fact that Jesus was prayed to which would make him God. However, we know it means prayer because they admitted this in their 1950 version of Acts 7:59! We also know it is a prayer because Jesus was nowhere near Stephen during his death and he said 'receive my spirit'. Nobody other than God himself could ever be prayed to and receive someone's spirit.
  • The WatchTower Is Deceptive!
    John 8:58 - Their 1969 Kingdom Interlinear Translation proves that they changed the words of Jesus from saying "I am" to "I have been". It changes the complete thought of the verse and is a deception. The Jews knew exactly what he was saying (see Exodus. 3:14-15 in a real Bible). They understood he was claiming to be God and thought he was guilty of blasphemy. Stoning was the punishment due for someone guilty of blasphemy. This is why they picked up stones to kill him. Jehovah's Witnesses, why would the people have wanted to kill him simply because he said "I have been"? By the way, their 2013 Gray New World Translation does not have any notes about why they changed the 'I am' to 'I have been'. You would think that they would at least put a footnote in their Bible so the reader would have a better understanding of what happened. Appparently, they think it is more important to place a footnote on the same page that clarifies how "since he began" could also mean "from the beginning" when the verse is about Satan!
    The 1969 Kingdom Interlinear shows how John 8:58 has been changed from saying 'I am' to 'I have been'.

    1. John 14:14 : John 14:14 in their 1969 Kingdom Interlinear Translation proves they removed the word 'me'. If they had let the text unaltered, it would have said we can pray to Jesus himself in his name. They changed the text to fit their doctrine since they do not believe Jesus is God. Therefore, he should not be prayed to.

    2. 1 Corinthians 10:9 : They have committed deception multiple ways in connection with this verse.

      1. They render the word 'Kyrios' as Jehovah instead of 'Lord'. In their Interlinear translation, it shows the same word that they have translated numerous times as 'Lord' in regards to Jesus! They pick and choose when to translate this word correctly. The reason they have it here as Jehovah and not Lord is because someone could prove Jesus is Jehovah by comparing other scriptures. For example, they have a cross reference to Deuteronomy 6:16 and Numbers 21:6 which are about Jehovah. These scriptures are related with Exodus 17:7 which is also about Jehovah. So if they had translated correctly with Lord (Jesus) in 1 Corinthians 10:9, this would mean Jesus was the one who was tempted and sent the serpents. Which would mean Jesus is Jehovah God.

      2. They have a footnote pointing to Appendix A5 to support their translation. If you go there though, all it talks about is the divine name being restored in the new testament and supporting reasons for why they think the Tetragrammaton was in the original Greek text. There is no hard evidence, but only speculation. Assuming they are even correct, they say nothing about why they fail to translate 'Kyrios' as Jehovah every time! They explain it as if they diligently translated 'Kyrios' as Jehovah throughout the entire New Testament, which is far from the truth. For example, they say "It uses the name Jehovah a total of 237 times in the Christian Greek Scriptures". It is not until someone actually researches a little bit that they learn this word occurs in the New Testament more than 700 times though. They translate the word as Jehovah only a small fraction of the time. They translate the word differently depending on how convenient it is for them and whether or not it is in agreement with their false doctrine. Yet, at the end of Appendix A5 they said their translators "have a deep respect for the divine name and a healthy fear of removing anything that appeared in the original text". This is deceptive wording for 2 reasons. First, if they had a deep respect and healthy fear for the divine name, they would consistently translate 'Kyrios' as Jehovah each and every time. Secondly, they could never be guilty of 'removing' anything since all they provided was speculation and the Tetragrammaton actually does not appear in any of the New Testament manuscripts. Even if it had originally appeared, they would not be 'removing' anything since this was already done centuries ago. You cannot remove anything that has already been removed. They use wording like this throughout the Appendix A5 to portray to readers that they are honest and scholarly, but it is all deception once someone does the research.

      3. They also conveniently fail to mention that some manuscripts of 1 Corinthians 10:9 use the word 'Christos' (Christ) and not 'Kyrios' (Lord). Which means in other manuscripts more detail was provided by showing who the Lord is. Of course, the NWT has no mention to this in their footnotes or Appendix A5. They not only disregard other manuscripts which detail specifically that this is Christ, but they do not even translate the word as Lord.

    3. 2 Corinthians 13:5 : In their own Kingdom Interlinear Translation, on the right side it says "in union with you" but on the left side this is nowhere to be found. It only says "in you". They intentionally changed the thought completely. Saying "in union with you" is completely different than "in you". They dont believe Jesus can live inside anyone so this is why they intentionally made this change.

    4. 2 Peter 1:1 : In their own Kingdom Interlinear Translation, on the right side it shows they inserted the word 'the' in brackets and on the left side the word 'the' is not in the original text. In their 2013 version of 2 Peter 1:1, they have the word 'the' in the text with no brackets and no footnote explaining why it was added. The reason why they added it is because it makes it look as if their are two separate persons instead of one. If they had let the text unaltered, it would mean Jesus is our God and Savior.
    Questions For Jehovah's Witnesses
    1. In your Bible, you have a section of John 8:58 translated as "I have been" when it should have been translated "I am". Why would the Jews have tried stoning him after he simply said "I have been"? Jesus had just got done saying that they were not from God and were also liars, but yet they didn't want to stone him. Why wasn't it until only after he said "I have been" did they want to stone him?

    2. In your Bible, you have a word 'me' removed from John 14:14. Your 1969 Kingdom Interlinear Translation proves that the missing word 'me' must be there. If translated correctly, doesn't this mean that we can pray to Jesus himself?

    3. If old false teachings can simply be explained away by receiving "new light" then isn't this like the WatchTower setting themselves up to never be wrong or accountable?

    4. If old false teachings can simply be explained away by receiving "new light", then it is theoretically possible that what you are teaching now may actually be false because in another 5 years or so there can be "new light" again. Since this is the case, wouldn't Jehovah be responsible for spreading false teaching?

    5. If the Holy Spirit is only Jehovah's active force, why does the Holy Spirit speak and use the pronouns "I" and "me" about himself in places like Acts 13:2 and Hebrews 3:7?

    6. Why does your Bible render the word 'proskuneo' as 'obeisance' in regards to Jesus, but as 'worship' in regards to Jehovah and even Satan?

    7. Why did the translators of your Bible conveniently fail to insert the word 'Jehovah' in Philippians 2:11, Romans 10:9, and 1 Corinthians 12:3?

    8. Why does JW artwork consistently show through all the years Jesus with a single nail through his wrist at the time of crucifixion? Scriptures do not say anything about the wrist and John 20:25 says that more than one nail was used for his hands.

    9. In Acts 5 verse 3 it says that Ananias lied to the Holy Spirit and in verse 4 it says that Ananias lied to God. Ignoring the direct correlation between God and the Holy Spirit, if the Holy Spirit is not a person and is just God's active force, how can it even be lied to?

    10. How do you explain the direct correlation made between the Holy Spirit and Jehovah made at Acts 28:25-27 and Isaiah 6:8-10? There is even a footnote between the two passages in your own Bible. In Acts it says the Holy Spirit spoke, but in Isaiah it says Jehovah spoke.

    11. How do you explain the direct correlation made between the Holy Spirit and Jehovah made at Hebrews 3:7 and Psalms 95:7-11? There are multiple footnotes between the two passages in the NWT. In Hebrews it says the Holy Spirit spoke, but in Psalms it says Jehovah spoke.

    12. How do you explain Rev. 3:21 and Rev. 22:1-4 where it says there is a single throne that belongs to both Jehovah and Jesus? Also, how do you explain the singular words 'his' and 'him' being used when both Jehovah and Jesus are the subject?

    13. How do you explain Rev. 5:6, 13-14 which shows that Jehovah, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit as all receiving the same exact worship at the same exact time?

    14. Why do you make a big deal out of the invented name 'Jehovah' when your own organization admitted several times that nobody actually knows the true name of God?

    15. Since Jehovah's Witnesses believe that you cannot truly know someone without knowing their name, doesn't this mean that you don't know your own God then since nobody knows the true name of God?

    16. Since God is all-powerful and all-knowing, why is it that God let his name remain unknown, but we know the name of Jesus?

    17. Why is it that we don't know the name of God, but we do know the name of Jesus and it is his name by which we are saved and it is his name that is above EVERY name?

    18. Why is it that you are called 'Jehovah's Witnesses' but Isaiah 62:2 says God would call his people by a new name (single name, not names) and that new name was already assigned in Acts 11:26?
    I left the WatchTower. Now what? Jesus Died On A Cross
    Jehovah's Witnesses are adamant that Jesus died on a 'torture stake' and not a cross. They take Matthew 23:24 to a whole new level. For example, they make a big deal about such a topic, but then teach such things like Jesus is Michael the Archangel! There is more proof from the Bible that he died on a cross than there is for the torture stake. Some of the proof is listed below.
    1. John 20:25 in the NWT says, "Unless I see in his hands the print of the NAILS". So there was more than 1 nail used for his hands. Hands stretched horizontally to the sides, as would be the case with a cross, would require more than 1 nail.
    2. Matthew 27:37 in the NWT says, "They also posted ABOVE HIS HEAD the charge against him, in writing". Notice that it doesn't say 'above his hands' or 'above his arms'. Which would have been necessary if his arms were stretched vertically on a torture stake. Rather, it says "above his head" which is completely accurate if his arms were stretched horizontally on a cross.
    3. John 19:19-20 in the NWT also gives us a clue. It says, "MANY OF THE JEWS READ THIS TITLE, because the place where Jesus was nailed to the stake was NEAR THE CITY, and it was WRITTEN IN HEBREW, IN LATIN, AND IN GREEK". These clues suggest that the sign was big. It is saying that many people read the sign since it was near the city and because it was in multiple languages. It wasn't some little sign that could only be read by the followers of Jesus, the religious rulers, and soldiers who were standing up close to Jesus. It was specifically made so that people in the nearby city or passerby to/from the city could read it. There would have been no point in making a sign in 3 languages only to have it read by the people who were up close to Jesus. So the sign had to be big enough to accomplish the goal of it being read by people of the city, which it sucessfully did according to the verse. It at least had to be big enough to adequately contain the phrase in 3 languages and not only 1. Since the sign had to be a good size, there probably would not have been enough room on the torture stake at the top above his vertically stretched arms. Not unless they had a custom-sized torture stake prepared for him in advance. Which would go against what the Bible says since Jesus was taken at night and he was sent to different locations before his death. The Bible implies that the circumstances leading to his death were in haste. Even the sign had to be prepared on the fly. They were not prepared for all this. So they certainly used the same standard length pieces of wood for Jesus as they did for everyone else. This theory lends evidence that Jesus died on a Cross with arms stretched horizontally. Only arms streteched horizontally would have left plenty of room at the top for the big sign!
    The Jehovah's Witnesses consistently illustrate in their artwork Jesus having a single nail through his wrists. Not NAILS as John 20:25 states. Nowhere in scripture is the wrist ever mentioned in regards to the crucifixion of Jesus.
    Also, notice how small the text in the sign is. A sign of this size would not be easily readable to anyone other than people standing directly in front of Jesus. The sign was probably much bigger to have more visibility. See point #3 above.
    The WatchTower consistently illustrate in their artwork Jesus having a nail through his wrists and not his hands.

    More inaccurate artwork produced by the WatchTower. Notice in both images a single nail through the wrist. Not NAILS. And again, the wrist had nothing to do with this.
    Also, notice again such a small sign. In reality, someone who would go to the trouble of having a sign made in 3 languages would not make the sign so small so that it would be hard to see. Also, notice on the left image how there is little room left at the top of the torture stake for a sign. See point #3 above.
    More inaccurate artwork showing Jesus having a single nail through his wrists and not his hands.
    Jehovah = God's Name. Really??? Proof Holy Spirit Is God Concept Of Trinity In NWT
    Invalid JW Arguments
    The Jehovah's Witnesses often use invalid arguments in debating. Some of their same arguments can even be used against them to prove they are wrong. Some examples of these invalid arguments are below.
    1. Jesus cannot be God because he is the Son.
      ANSWER:
      Saying Jesus cannot be God because he is the 'Son of God' is the same as saying Jesus cannot be man since he is the 'Son of Man'. Anyways, human logic is not the final authority. The Bible, which is God's Word, is the final authority.

    2. Jesus cannot be God since he is the 'firstborn' (Colossians 1:15)
      ANSWER:
      1) Firstborn here does not mean born first. It is a term related to position, authority, and status. The Bible has the term 'firstborn' in other verses and it has nothing to do with being born (created) first. For example, David was firstborn, but he was actually the last born. Another example is how Jacob was the firstborn, but he actually was not born first. The context of Colossians itself proves this point. It is talking about Christ's Supremacy. Of course, the Watchtower knows all this and it is why they have perverted this text by adding the word 'other' multiple times in Colossians chapter 1.

      2) The term 'firstborn' was used in a prophecy about Jesus located in Psalms. See Psalms 89:27 where it says David would be placed as firstborn even after he already existed. Psalms 89 has it's final fulfillment with Jesus Christ himself! Jesus, who is in the line of David, is the king of kings, he is the ruler over all the kings of the earth, and he will rule forever. So Jesus, who is in the line of David and who fulfilled the prophecy about David, had the term firstborn placed on him and it has nothing to do with him being created. Psalms 89 also agrees with point 1 above because it links the term firstborn with position, authority, and status.

      3) The term 'firstborn' can also apply to Jesus because he literally is the Son of God born by the Holy Spirit (God). See Romans 8:29 where it says Jesus would be firstborn among many brothers. It's talking about humans here. Again, this verse has nothing to do with Jesus being created. The term here is in reference to his Earthly life. He was born by the Spirit just like we too are all to be born by the Spirit in his likeness.

      4) The term 'firstborn' in Revelation 1:5 is linked to Jesus death as a human. It says "firstborn from the dead". Again, it has nothing to do with being born or created. This verse also agrees with point 1 above and links the term 'firstborn' with position, authority, and status since it says Jesus is the Ruler of the kings of the Earth.

    3. Jesus cannot be God because he never said he is God.
      ANSWER:
      Jesus never said he is Michael the Archangel. Jesus never even said directly he is the Son of God, but we all know he is.

    4. The 'Trinity' cannot be true since it has pagan history.
      ANSWER:
      So does the Jehovah's Witness religion! Look at your own religion before using this argument. If Charles Taze Russell was alive today, he would be disfellowshipped in a heartbeart. This argument is simply invalid because Satan likes to mimic and counterfeit God. Of course, he will take a Biblical concept and twist it to mislead others later. It's what he does.

    5. The 'Trinity' cannot be true because the word never appears in the Bible.
      ANSWER:
      Neither do many words we use. Are the words 'Kingdom Hall' or 'Theocratic Ministry School' in the Bible? The word 'Trinity' is just a word that everybody is familiar with. What is important is the CONCEPT of the trinity. The concept of the trinity is clearly in the Bible.

    6. You are wrong because we have the truth!
      ANSWER:
      Jehovah's Witnesses, just because you hear how you have the truth a thousand times per year doesn't make it the truth. The Jehovah's Witness religion has bad history, has made false prophecies, has perverted God's word, and has been deceptive. For each of the 4 reasons just mentioned, there is biblical proof that it is IMPOSSIBLE for you to be the true religion.

    7. We have the most accurate Bible translation in existence.
      ANSWER:
      Your own Kingdom Interlinear Translation proves in multiple places how the WatchTower has intentionally altered scripture to fit their teachings. Your prior Bible versions can also prove the same thing when compared to the new 2013 version. Furthermore, the so-called translators remain secret to this day. When asked why this is the case, a JW will say it is to keep glory from going to the translators. Which is an excuse. The names of more important Jehovah's Witnesses do not remain secret. For example, the governing body members are all known. The so-called translators are the only ones that remain secret. You can take any well known Bible and you can find the translators responsible. For example, the new NET Bible has a list of professional scholars and translators with their actual names, credentials, and education. The NET includes more than 29000 translation notes to explain why verses were translated the way they were. This is complete transparency. Unlike the New World Translation which is secretive and deceptive.

    8. Jesus is 'Mighty God' but not 'Almighty God'
      ANSWER:
      First, this contradicts multiple scriptures like Isaiah 44:6-8 which clearly says there is only one God and there is no other God. So 'Mighty God' and 'Almighty God' must be referring to the same God if the scriptures are true. Secondly, Jehovah himself in your own Bible is called 'Mighty God'. See Isaiah 10:20-21 which is only one chapter after Isaiah 9:6 which calls Jesus 'Mighty God'.

    9. You cannot know someone unless you know their name.
      ANSWER:
      By your own admission then, you don't know your own God. According to your own Watchtower organization, they do not know God's name and say it is impossible for anyone to know God's true name. There is a section on this website dedicated to this topic. Therefore, you are admitting that you don't truly know your own God.

      The Bible shows us that it is possible to know God without knowing his name. See Exodus 6:2-4 where it says that Jehovah appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but he never revealed his name to them. Yet, not only did they know him, but God made a covenant with them!

      Secondly, all one needs to do is consider some real life situations to know that it is certainly possible to know someone without knowing their name. Let's say you went to school with someone for years during childhood. Years later, you see that person at the supermarket from the distance and say "I know him". You can recall childhood memories in great detail of being together at school and talking with that person. Yet, you no longer can remember the person's name! You still know the person though.

      Or let's say someone gets a legal name change. You could know a person intimately for years, but if they were to get their name changed, it would not prevent you from knowing that person and it doesn't mean you would know that person any less.

      Another real life example is when someone goes by a false name or a nick name. You could know someone for years and call them by a name that is not actually their real name. It would not mean you never knew the person or know the person any less.

    10. Matthew 6:9 proves we need to pray to God in his personal name.
      ANSWER:
      First, if this prayer is to be taken as instruction for praying to the Father in his personal name, then why didn't Jesus do this himself? He did not do this, but only ever said "Father". Considering this is a model prayer, Jesus failed to do the job, if JW logic is true.

      Secondly, Jesus prayed that the Father's name be sanctified or hallowed depending on what translation you use. This means to be made set apart or more holy. That's all the text says. Jesus doesn't say how this will happen or who will do this. Actually, this had already happened on Earth and the prayer was for the continuation of this. We know that the Jews considered this name so holy that they were afraid to even use it. So the prayer was for the continuation of this just like he showed us to pray for other things we already have like receiving daily bread. Taking the text of this verse and saying this means we need to use God's personal name in prayer is a twisting of text. The text simply doesn't say this.

      Lastly, the Bible clearly says what name is above every name and by what name we are to be saved. That name is Jesus! There are multiple verses to prove this. Which the JW religion has purposely changed by doing things like adding the word 'other' where it doesn't belong. Also, read the other section of this website about the name Jehovah. You will see that this is an invented name and nobody knows the Father's real name. The JWs just use this name to set themselves as different from other religions. It serves as company branding for their corporation.
    Jesus Was Physically Resurrected Jesus Was Never Recreated
    Brainwashed Jehovah's Witnesses Titles Shared By Jehovah & Jesus
    Jehovah's Witnesses, all information found on this website has been taken from your own Watchtower publications! All examples are freely available and can be easily verified. Please review everything carefully for yourself to see if what is being said is true or not. There is absolutely no reason to be fearful about looking at this information.

    Invalid Jehovah's WitnessesArguments

                                         Invalid Jehovah's WitnessesArguments

    The Jehovah's Witnesses often use invalid arguments in debating. Some of their same arguments can even be used against them to prove they are wrong. Some examples of these invalid arguments are below.
    1. Jesus cannot be God because he is the Son.
      ANSWER:
      Saying Jesus cannot be God because he is the 'Son of God' is the same as saying Jesus cannot be man since he is the 'Son of Man'. Anyways, human logic is not the final authority. The Bible, which is God's Word, is the final authority.

    2. Jesus cannot be God since he is the 'firstborn' (Colossians 1:15)
      ANSWER:
      1) Firstborn here does not mean born first. It is a term related to position, authority, and status. The Bible has the term 'firstborn' in other verses and it has nothing to do with being born (created) first. For example, David was firstborn, but he was actually the last born. Another example is how Jacob was the firstborn, but he actually was not born first. The context of Colossians itself proves this point. It is talking about Christ's Supremacy. Of course, the Watchtower knows all this and it is why they have perverted this text by adding the word 'other' multiple times in Colossians chapter 1.

      2) The term 'firstborn' was used in a prophecy about Jesus located in Psalms. See Psalms 89:27 where it says David would be placed as firstborn even after he already existed. Psalms 89 has it's final fulfillment with Jesus Christ himself! Jesus, who is in the line of David, is the king of kings, he is the ruler over all the kings of the earth, and he will rule forever. So Jesus, who is in the line of David and who fulfilled the prophecy about David, had the term firstborn placed on him and it has nothing to do with him being created. Psalms 89 also agrees with point 1 above because it links the term firstborn with position, authority, and status.

      3) The term 'firstborn' can also apply to Jesus because he literally is the Son of God born by the Holy Spirit (God). See Romans 8:29 where it says Jesus would be firstborn among many brothers. It's talking about humans here. Again, this verse has nothing to do with Jesus being created. The term here is in reference to his Earthly life. He was born by the Spirit just like we too are all to be born by the Spirit in his likeness.

      4) The term 'firstborn' in Revelation 1:5 is linked to Jesus death as a human. It says "firstborn from the dead". Again, it has nothing to do with being born or created. This verse also agrees with point 1 above and links the term 'firstborn' with position, authority, and status since it says Jesus is the Ruler of the kings of the Earth.

    3. Jesus cannot be God because he never said he is God.
      ANSWER:
      Jesus never said he is Michael the Archangel. Jesus never even said directly he is the Son of God, but we all know he is.

    4. The 'Trinity' cannot be true since it has pagan history.
      ANSWER:
      So does the Jehovah's Witness religion! Look at your own religion before using this argument. If Charles Taze Russell was alive today, he would be disfellowshipped in a heartbeart. This argument is simply invalid because Satan likes to mimic and counterfeit God. Of course, he will take a Biblical concept and twist it to mislead others later. It's what he does.

    5. The 'Trinity' cannot be true because the word never appears in the Bible.
      ANSWER:
      Neither do many words we use. Are the words 'Kingdom Hall' or 'Theocratic Ministry School' in the Bible? The word 'Trinity' is just a word that everybody is familiar with. What is important is the CONCEPT of the trinity. The concept of the trinity is clearly in the Bible.

    6. You are wrong because we have the truth!
      ANSWER:
      Jehovah's Witnesses, just because you hear how you have the truth a thousand times per year doesn't make it the truth. The Jehovah's Witness religion has bad history, has made false prophecies, has perverted God's word, and has been deceptive. For each of the 4 reasons just mentioned, there is biblical proof that it is IMPOSSIBLE for you to be the true religion.

    7. We have the most accurate Bible translation in existence.
      ANSWER:
      Your own Kingdom Interlinear Translation proves in multiple places how the WatchTower has intentionally altered scripture to fit their teachings. Your prior Bible versions can also prove the same thing when compared to the new 2013 version. Furthermore, the so-called translators remain secret to this day. When asked why this is the case, a JW will say it is to keep glory from going to the translators. Which is an excuse. The names of more important Jehovah's Witnesses do not remain secret. For example, the governing body members are all known. The so-called translators are the only ones that remain secret. You can take any well known Bible and you can find the translators responsible. For example, the new NET Bible has a list of professional scholars and translators with their actual names, credentials, and education. The NET includes more than 29000 translation notes to explain why verses were translated the way they were. This is complete transparency. Unlike the New World Translation which is secretive and deceptive.

    8. Jesus is 'Mighty God' but not 'Almighty God'
      ANSWER:
      First, this contradicts multiple scriptures like Isaiah 44:6-8 which clearly says there is only one God and there is no other God. So 'Mighty God' and 'Almighty God' must be referring to the same God if the scriptures are true. Secondly, Jehovah himself in your own Bible is called 'Mighty God'. See Isaiah 10:20-21 which is only one chapter after Isaiah 9:6 which calls Jesus 'Mighty God'.

    9. You cannot know someone unless you know their name.
      ANSWER:
      By your own admission then, you don't know your own God. According to your own Watchtower organization, they do not know God's name and say it is impossible for anyone to know God's true name. There is a section on this website dedicated to this topic. Therefore, you are admitting that you don't truly know your own God.

      The Bible shows us that it is possible to know God without knowing his name. See Exodus 6:2-4 where it says that Jehovah appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but he never revealed his name to them. Yet, not only did they know him, but God made a covenant with them!

      Secondly, all one needs to do is consider some real life situations to know that it is certainly possible to know someone without knowing their name. Let's say you went to school with someone for years during childhood. Years later, you see that person at the supermarket from the distance and say "I know him". You can recall childhood memories in great detail of being together at school and talking with that person. Yet, you no longer can remember the person's name! You still know the person though.

      Or let's say someone gets a legal name change. You could know a person intimately for years, but if they were to get their name changed, it would not prevent you from knowing that person and it doesn't mean you would know that person any less.

      Another real life example is when someone goes by a false name or a nick name. You could know someone for years and call them by a name that is not actually their real name. It would not mean you never knew the person or know the person any less.

    10. Matthew 6:9 proves we need to pray to God in his personal name.
      ANSWER:
      First, if this prayer is to be taken as instruction for praying to the Father in his personal name, then why didn't Jesus do this himself? He did not do this, but only ever said "Father". Considering this is a model prayer, Jesus failed to do the job, if JW logic is true.

      Secondly, Jesus prayed that the Father's name be sanctified or hallowed depending on what translation you use. This means to be made set apart or more holy. That's all the text says. Jesus doesn't say how this will happen or who will do this. Actually, this had already happened on Earth and the prayer was for the continuation of this. We know that the Jews considered this name so holy that they were afraid to even use it. So the prayer was for the continuation of this just like he showed us to pray for other things we already have like receiving daily bread. Taking the text of this verse and saying this means we need to use God's personal name in prayer is a twisting of text. The text simply doesn't say this.

      Lastly, the Bible clearly says what name is above every name and by what name we are to be saved. That name is Jesus! There are multiple verses to prove this. Which the JW religion has purposely changed by doing things like adding the word 'other' where it doesn't belong. Also, read the other section of this website about the name Jehovah. You will see that this is an invented name and nobody knows the Father's real name. The JWs just use this name to set themselves as different from other religions. It serves as company branding for their corporation.

    lies of Jehovah's Witnesses Jesus died on a cross

                  lies of  Jehovah's Witnesses  Jesus died on a cross

    Jehovah's Witnesses are adamant that Jesus died on a 'torture stake' and not a cross. They take Matthew 23:24 to a whole new level. For example, they make a big deal about such a topic, but then teach such things like Jesus is Michael the Archangel! There is more proof from the Bible that he died on a cross than there is for the torture stake. Some of the proof is listed below.
    1. John 20:25 in the NWT says, "Unless I see in his hands the print of the NAILS". So there was more than 1 nail used for his hands. Hands stretched horizontally to the sides, as would be the case with a cross, would require more than 1 nail.
    2. Matthew 27:37 in the NWT says, "They also posted ABOVE HIS HEAD the charge against him, in writing". Notice that it doesn't say 'above his hands' or 'above his arms'. Which would have been necessary if his arms were stretched vertically on a torture stake. Rather, it says "above his head" which is completely accurate if his arms were stretched horizontally on a cross.
    3. John 19:19-20 in the NWT also gives us a clue. It says, "MANY OF THE JEWS READ THIS TITLE, because the place where Jesus was nailed to the stake was NEAR THE CITY, and it was WRITTEN IN HEBREW, IN LATIN, AND IN GREEK". These clues suggest that the sign was big. It is saying that many people read the sign since it was near the city and because it was in multiple languages. It wasn't some little sign that could only be read by the followers of Jesus, the religious rulers, and soldiers who were standing up close to Jesus. It was specifically made so that people in the nearby city or passerby to/from the city could read it. There would have been no point in making a sign in 3 languages only to have it read by the people who were up close to Jesus. So the sign had to be big enough to accomplish the goal of it being read by people of the city, which it sucessfully did according to the verse. It at least had to be big enough to adequately contain the phrase in 3 languages and not only 1. Since the sign had to be a good size, there probably would not have been enough room on the torture stake at the top above his vertically stretched arms. Not unless they had a custom-sized torture stake prepared for him in advance. Which would go against what the Bible says since Jesus was taken at night and he was sent to different locations before his death. The Bible implies that the circumstances leading to his death were in haste. Even the sign had to be prepared on the fly. They were not prepared for all this. So they certainly used the same standard length pieces of wood for Jesus as they did for everyone else. This theory lends evidence that Jesus died on a Cross with arms stretched horizontally. Only arms streteched horizontally would have left plenty of room at the top for the big sign!
    The Jehovah's Witnesses consistently illustrate in their artwork Jesus having a single nail through his wrists. Not NAILS as John 20:25 states. Nowhere in scripture is the wrist ever mentioned in regards to the crucifixion of Jesus.
    Also, notice how small the text in the sign is. A sign of this size would not be easily readable to anyone other than people standing directly in front of Jesus. The sign was probably much bigger to have more visibility. See point #3 above.
    The WatchTower consistently illustrate in their artwork Jesus having a nail through his wrists and not his hands.
    More inaccurate artwork produced by the WatchTower. Notice in both images a single nail through the wrist. Not NAILS. And again, the wrist had nothing to do with this.
    Also, notice again such a small sign. In reality, someone who would go to the trouble of having a sign made in 3 languages would not make the sign so small so that it would be hard to see. Also, notice on the left image how there is little room left at the top of the torture stake for a sign. See point #3 above.
    More inaccurate artwork showing Jesus having a single nail through his wrists and not his hands.

    Saturday, December 12, 2015

    Two Bodies Disappear From Benin Mortuary

    A possible breakdown of law and order at the Benin City Central Hospital, was averted by the police on Friday, following the mysterious disappearance of two corpses from the hospital morgue.

    It was gathered that relatives of the deceased persons had gone to the hospital on Thursday to collect the corpses for burial when they discovered that they were missing from the hospital mortuary.
    The discovery caused stair and confusion at the hospital, as no one could offer reasonable explanation to the deceased families.
    Image result for photo of dead body 

    Michael Idemudia, the eldest son of one of the deceased, who spoke on behalf of the family, said his father died while he was being taken to the hospital for treatment.
    He explained that his 54-years-old dead father, a retired police officer, was deposited in the mortuary on the 18 November, 2015. He said he went to collect his clothes on the 21st of same month but could not understand why the corpse will be missing on the day of the burial when arrangements have been made.

    Idemudia alleged the hospital management was doing nothing about it, rather they locked everywhere.

    “My name is Idemudia Michael. I live at 23, Omomo Street off St. Saviour Road. He is my father, and we are from Ovia North-East local government area.

    “We brought the corpse on the 18th of November, 2015 to this hospital. We were rushing him to the hospital when he gave up and we brought him here. When he died, we were looking for money to burial him. We came to check on the 21st when they called me to come pick up his clothes.

    “About two days ago, we came to clear the bills and we had no chance to check him again because we were in a hurry. That is where we made the mistake of not checking him. When we came on Thursday to carry the corpse, it was nowhere to be found and the burial is Thursday and Friday.

    “The hospital management said we should take it easy that they are going to investigate the matter,” Idemudia said.
    The family of late Lawrence Agbonlahor, whose body is also allegedly missing from the hospital mortuary, also narrated the suffering they have been made to go through as a result of the incident.

    The younger brother of the deceased, Friday Agbonlahor, said he saw brother’s corpse three days ago and could not understand how it suddenly disappeared.

    “In this country, everything you suffer even the dead, to collect the corpse. I came to see it twice in not less than three weeks to ensure that they take care of it. Only for us to come today (Friday) to remove the corpse and it is nowhere to be found.

    “On Monday we saw the corpse and even on Thursday when we made preparation for the burial, they said we should not see it since the burial is on Friday.

    “This morning somebody came to tell us that there is a problem in the mortuary because of missing corpse because they locked up everywhere. I never envisaged that I will not be taking my corpse, only to get here they are telling me a different story,” Agbolanhor said.

    The hospital management could not be reached as they were said to be in an emergency meeting likely to resolve the mystery surrounding the missing corpses.

    Following the incident, family members who deposited corpses of their dead ones at the hospital were alleged to be transferring them to other mortuary
    Back to top

    Wednesday, June 3, 2015

    iPhone 7 (6s) release date, features, specs and rumours: Force touch coming to the next iPhone


    iPhone 7 (6s) release date, features, specs and rumours: Force touch coming to the next iPhone

    New iPhone 6S/iPhone 7 rumours suggest a Force Touch display will be coming soon.

    26 May 2015


    Page 1 of 3 iPhone 7 (6s) release date, features, specs and rumours: Force touch coming to the next iPhone


    The iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus are currently Apple's most advanced smartphones, but Apple are already working on an update. Tipped to have Force Touch technology - shown on the Apple Watch - an upgraded A9 processor and Bendgate-resilient construction, the iPhone 7 (6s) could be the best yet.
    Still several months out from its expected release, there's very little to go on, but predictions from trusted analysts and a look at Apple's previous form could hold answers.
    Although Apple could skip straight to the 7, it's looking more likely that the company will be launching a new iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus this year.
    Latest rumour: Apple to bring Force Touch to iOS 9, suggesting it will be incorporated into the next iPhone. According to 9to5Mac, which has an excellent track record with Apple rumours, the "iPhone 6S" will be getting support for Force Touch on its screen. The technology, which is already available in the Apple Watch and new MacBook, allows users to press harder on a trackpad or touch screen in order to bring up additional menu items or functionality. For example, Force Touch in Apple Maps will allow a user to press harder on the screen to drop a pin for navigation, or pressing hard on a word to bring up a definition.
    Jump to:

    iPhone 7 (6s) will be revealed in August, analyst claims

    Apple iPhone 7 release date - iOS 9
    KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has said to his clients the iPhone 7 (6s) will be anounced at a launch event ahead of Apple's usual September conference and launch date. Kuo also claims Foxconn will manufacture 60 - 70% of the new iPhones.
    Interestingly, Apple has never taken such path towards launching a new iPhone. Usually the Californian tech company launches a new iPhone at a September conference with a launch weeks later. Perhaps Kuo has insider knowledge on what we can expect from Apple, but for now we'd file this in the rumours department instead of concrete evidence of Apple's motives.

    Force Touch and an A9 processor could keep the iPhone 7 (6s) ahead of the competition.

    After the release of the Apple Watch, one of its first all-new products under the leadership of Tim Cook, Apple is now preparing to update the iPhone 6. So what’s in store? According to the trusted KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo in a note to investors, the iPhone 6s and 6 Plus s will be receiving an incremental update, typical of previous S models.

    Force Touch and an A9 processor will debut in the iPhone 7 (6s)

    Already seen on the Apple Watch and Apple’s most recent MacBooks, Force Touch is tipped to be on its way to the new iPhone. Able to measure different pressures, Apple has used the feature on the Apple Watch to make better use of its limited screen size – and on the latest MacBooks to expand on multi-touch gestures. Far from a gimmick, Force Touch offers an easy secondary click to touchscreen devices, the ability to support handwritten signatures and has more potential that’s just waiting to be unlocked.
    Contrary to other reports, Kuo believes Apple will stick to its 4.7in and 5.5in screen sizes, rejecting the reintroduction of a 4in screen.
    As you’d expect, the iPhone 6s and 6 Plus is also rumoured to receive a speed bump, much like the 5s before it. This time using the Samsung made A9 processor, the new iPhone could benefit from an upgraded 2GB of LPDDR4 ram. The camera resolution is also likely to be increased to 12 megapixels, with the upgraded 6 Plus possibly receiving a sapphire lens cover.

    Improved Touch ID and the end of Bendgate

    Introduced on the iPhone 5s in September 2013, Touch ID is now available on every mobile Apple device, but the company is hoping to improve print recognition in its latest handset. Already one of the the best fingerprint recognition systems, Apple is pushing for even better accuracy - making Apple Pay a more viable, foolproof payment method.
    As well as an extra microphone for improved call quality, the new iPhone 6s will also be available in Rose Gold - great news for the lucky few with a Rose Gold Apple Watch Edition. Kuo’s predictions also suggest that Apple will attempt to leave Bendgate behind them by using stronger case materials this time round.
    Kuo goes on to predict production could start around around August, pointing again to a September release like the previous s model. Like the Apple iPhone 5s, the subtle improvements predicted wouldn’t make the 6s essential for owners of the 6 – but could make it an attractive upgrade for owners of any older models.

    Could the iPhone 7 turn out like this?

    Following on from the news of dual camera technology potentially coming to iPhone 7, concept artist Martin Hajek and Computer Build.tv put together a video of what he expects Apple's new smartphone to turn out like.
    While pure speculation, Hajek believes the iPhone 7 will stick to a similar design as the iPhone 6 with a smattering of new features. While Touch ID still exists, Hajek has integrated it directly into the display, moving the phone speaker, Face Time camera and proximity sensor to the phone's top edge. He also believes we'll see Apple replace it's antenna bars with an "antenna ring" and make use of the rumoured dual-camera technology.
    Hajek's work is certainly sleeker than the proposed Digital Crown design of Antonio De Rosa, but it's still unlikely to become true. While the dual-camera technology could come to fruition thanks to Apple's acquisition of LinX, it's highly unlikely Apple would have curved corners to its screen, or integrate the Touch ID sensor into the display. It also wouldn't feature a glowing apple logo, instead opting for the usual metal finish with the iPhone 6's NFC chip underneath.
    Still, it's a great way to imagine what the future of the iPhone could be.

    iPhone 7: release date

    Apple iPhone 7 release date - iPhone 6 sizes
    The iPhone 7 or 6s and its Plus counterpart are likely to be introduced at a special event in San Francisco around 8 September 2015.
    Why then? Because it's in line with the company's usual pattern of unveiling its new handsets on the second Tuesday in September each year.
    We believe it's likely to go on sale in the UK ten days later, on 18 September. You can pretty much guarantee there will be a new iPhone in the stores before the end of September. If we're wrong about this, we'll be very very surprised.

    iPhone 7 : price

    While there's no confirmed price for Apple's upcoming iPhone, we believe it will be around the $650 mark for the standard model, and $750 for the Plus version.
    Since the iPhone 4, Apple's handset has launched at roughly the same price of $649. Judging from past experience, it's likely the iPhone 7 or 6s will also start at $649. As we've had less experience with Plus pricing, seeing as only one iteration of the model exists, it's more likely Apple could revise its pricing structure. However, you can safely expect it to retail around the $700-$750 mark.

    The best smartphones of 2015 - what's the best phone you can buy?


    The best smartphones of 2015 - what's the best phone you can buy?

    Discover the best smartphone for your pocket, budget and apps with our buying guide and in-depth reviews

    2 Jun 2015

    Page 1 of 2 The 17 best smartphones of 2015 - what's the best phone you can buy?


    If you want to know what the best smartphone on the market is, then you've come to the right place.
    Scroll down to see our pick of the ultimate smartphones available right now, or click through our "jump to" section to discover the questions you should be asking before you set out to buy a mobile.

    Best phones of 2015

    1. Samsung Galaxy S6

    Price when reviewed: 32GB, £600 inc VAT
    Samsung has finally rid plastic for its latest smartphone design and, aside from a few reservations, the result is a triumph. The S6 looks glorious with Gorilla Glass 4 at the front and rear and coloured metal beneath it to give it a glitzy, shimmering look. And it isn't only the exterior of the handset that sees improvements; Samsung has significantly beefed up the innards without impacting on battery life.
    The highlight, however, is the improved camera, which now boasts optical image stabilisation and a wide f/1.9 aperture for stunning image capture in all conditions.
    The S6 edge is just as good and arguably the more attractive device, but its unusual curved screen and the fact that there's no 32GB option bumps the price of an already expensive phone up to an eye-watering £760. Buy the S6: you won't regret it.

    2. LG G4

    Price when reviewed: £530 inc VAT (for the plastic-backed edition)
    Last year's LG G3 was a top smartphone – and still is (see below) – but the LG G4 is a different beast entirely: it has a camera to match the Samsung Galaxy S6, fast internals and a fantastic 5.5in quad HD display.
    It isn't as slim, sleek or outright delicious as the Samsung Galaxy S6, but the leather-backed options are surprisingly attractive, and if you place practicality before aesthetics, the LG G4 beats the S6 hands down.
    Unlike Samsung's leading light, the G4 boasts a removable 3,000mAh battery, so you can carry a spare for emergencies or replace a failing battery a year or two down the track; and it also has a microSD slot, so you're not stuck with the 32GB stock storage allocation. Plus, it's a touch cheaper than the S6.
    Currently, we have the LG G4 in second place in our smartphone list, because it isn't quite as quick as the Samsung Galaxy S6 and battery life isn't as good either, but it's a very, very close-run thing.

    3. Sony Xperia Z3 Compact

    Price when reviewed: £348 inc VAT
    Sony’s pint-sized smartphone packs in a host of premium features without the high-end price, including fast performance and waterproofing. It's the battery life that really sets this handset apart from the crowd, however, regularly delivering one to two days of use per charge.

    4. Samsung Galaxy S5

    Price on 30/03/15: £330 inc VAT
    There's an awful lot to like about the Samsung Galaxy S5: it's good-looking, tough, big, feature rich and we love the user-replaceable battery and memory expansion. It's a great smartphone in every way, and now that the S6 is here, the price is more reasonable. If you're not precious about the way your phone looks, the Samsung Galaxy S5 is a great buy.

    5. iPhone 6

    Price when reviewed: £539 inc VAT

    It's a brave new world for Apple's larger iPhone, and it's much the better for it. Super-fast, beautiful to look at and lovely to use. It's the dictionary definition of a flagship handset.

    6. Motorola Moto G

    Price when reviewed: £145 inc VAT
    A high-quality budget Android handset with an excellent screen and decent battery life. There's now a 4G version as well, for those hankering after faster mobile data.

    7. HTC One M9

    Price when reviewed: £580 inc VAT
    HTC took the One M8's design and refined it for 2015, creating a truly stunning smartphone. The internals have been upgraded as well: Qualcomm's octa-core Snapdragon 810 SoC; the camera goes from the M8's 4-megapixel snapper to 20 megapixels; and HTC has added a host of features to its Sense Android launcher software.
    It's a beautifully crafted and highly competent smartphone, just like last year's HTC One M8. But it's only a small improvement on the M8.

    8. LG G3

    Price when reviewed: £459 inc VAT
    LG rustles up a classy, top-rung smartphone, with a ridiculously high-resolution screen and super-fast camera; but that display takes its toll on battery life.

    9. Samsung Galaxy Note 4

    Price when reviewed: £599 inc VAT
    Samsung has produced the finest phablet yet. In addition to a new quad HD display and a smart new look, Samsung has bumped up the speed, battery life, camera quality and range of features – big-screened phones don't get any better than this.

    10. Samsung Galaxy Note Edge

    Price when reviewed: £609 inc VAT
    With most of the same features as the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 and a funky curved-edge display, it’s hard to criticise the edge. However, that curved display, intriguing as it is, adds significantly to the cost – and that's enough to cement the Note 4 as our large-screen smartphone of choice.

    11. Nexus 6

    Price when reviewed: £499 inc VAT
    The Nexus 6 has taken us by surprise in the short time we’ve had it. Once you sidle past the unavoidable fact of its gargantuan size, there’s an awful lot it does right. Battery life is good, the camera is excellent, and the build and design quality are second to none. And although its rivals hold an edge over it in many areas, the differences aren’t huge.

    12. iPhone 6 Plus

    Price when reviewed: £619 inc VAT

    Apple’s 5.5in giant isn’t for everyone, but for some it may prove the perfect mid-point between an iPad and iPhone. And contrary to initial reports, our long-term review sample hasn't suffered from any undue bending - it's remained rock-solid in the face of all the abuse we've dished out.

    13. Samsung Galaxy Alpha

    Price: £280 inc VAT
    The Galaxy Alpha is among Samsung's best-looking smartphones and, now that the Galaxy S6 is here, the price has sunk to a tempting £280 – almost half its original price. If you want a feature-packed smartphone at a reasonable price, it's worth a look.

    14. Motorola Moto X

    Price when reviewed: £419 inc VAT
    Motorola’s second-generation Moto X hits most of the right notes, coupling beautiful design with a hatful of innovative and useful features.

    15. Nokia Lumia 930

    Price when reviewed: £419 inc VAT
    The Lumia 930 is a knock-out from the first moment you pick it up. It's a Windows Phone device, so it can't compete on apps, but the design of Nokia's flagship is sumptuous and right up there with the best around.

    16. Sony Xperia Z3

    Price when reviewed: £477 inc VAT
    The successor to the Z2 isn't that much different. It's a touch slimmer and lighter, the screen is brighter, and the processor is clocked a fraction higher – but almost everything else is the same. It's a very good Android device, and if you can still find a Z2 for sale it will be much cheaper and almost as good.

    17. Motorola Moto E

    Price when reviewed: £109 inc VAT
    Makes plenty of compromises to keep costs down, but performs where it counts; the Moto E is another winner from Motorola at a highly tempting price. This is the best £100 handset by a country mile, and now it includes 4G.

    Saturday, January 10, 2015

    How Rich Is Neymar? - Despite Brazil's Humiliating Lost, This Man Is Rolling In Money

    How Rich Is Neymar? - Despite
    Brazil's Humiliating Lost, This Man Is Rolling In Money

    neymar net worth is 50 Million


    A ubiquitous figure, Neymar, continues to dominate and monopolize headlines all over. The media can’t seem to get enough of the man and who can blame them. His boyish charms and immaculate footballing skills make him one of the most marketable athletes in the world. In 2013, Barcelona acquired Neymar from Santos for a fee reported to be around

    25 Facts About Beyonce That Will Surprise You

    25 Facts About Beyonce
    That Will Surprise You 


    facts about beyonce you never knew
    Here are some facts about Beyonce that you probably never knew. No one in the current music industry can be mentioned in the same breath as Beyonce. With skilled dance moves, vocals from a neighbouring planet and looks that could kill, Beyonce is definitely the entire package. She never fails to entertain her fans with her live power packed performances. Beyonce is truly the star every young girl looks upto. Her physical assets alone deserve a column of their own. In the list below,
    the facts about Beyonce that have been compiled are assured to leave you surprised!
    1. Beyonce’s mother excels in hairstyling and costume designing whereas her father is a record

    25 Facts About Mark Zuckerberg That Will Surprise You

    25 Facts About Mark Zuckerberg
    That Will Surprise You

    If there could be anyone that could eclipse Bill Gates’s milestones or even come close to it, it is Mark Zuckerberg. The man became a billionaire aged 23 and has been building his empire around the social networking giant Facebook. There has even been a motion picture The Social Network loosely based on the whiz kid. The movie performed exceptionally well in the box office and critics were also impressed with the movie. In order to commemorate the brilliant Mark Zuckerberg, we have compiled a list of 25 facts about Mark Zuckerberg that’ll surprise you.
    facts about mark zuckerberg
    1. Mark Zuckerberg is of Bulgarian descent. It is believed that his maternal grandfather shifted base from Bulgaria in the 1940s.
    2. Both of his parents worked to make ends meet. His father served as a dentist while his mother

    Saturday, December 27, 2014

    13 richest women in africa

    13 richest women in africa


    Africa’s economy has been on the surge in recent years. According to the UN, its economy is expected to accelerate by 4.7% in 2014 and 5% in 2015. No doubt this is some great news, but what’s even more appealing is the fact that African women are taking center stage in spearheading this growth. As they play their crucial roles, these powerful women also fatten their bank accounts.  We take a look at the 13 richest women in Africa.
    13 Richest Women In Africa

    1. Isabel Dos Santos $4 Billion

    Even without a career of her own, Isabel would still be one of the richest women in Africa without breaking a sweat. She is the daughter of current Angolan president Jose Eduardo dos Santos who has held the reins for over three decades. Let’s not forget she wedded Sindika Dokolo whose father is said to be a millionaire. So clearly she got her finances in check.